- 1 1. PRGR LS Fairway Wood
- 2 2. Detailed Specifications
- 3 3. Key Technologies
- 4 4. Actual Reviews & Feedback
- 5 5. Pros and Cons Analysis
- 6 6. Suitable and Unsuitable Golfers
- 7 7. Performance Based on Head Speed
- 8 8. Comparison with Competitors
- 9 9. Purchasing Considerations
- 10 10. Maintenance and Storage
- 11 11. After-Sales Support
- 12 12. Conclusion
Test drive the Japanese golf club PRGR LS fairway wood

Today, I tested this golf club.
The club I tested is the PRGR LS Fairway Wood, 3-wood version.

The shaft is **SPEEDER NX FOR PRGR**.
The loft is 16.5 degrees, the club length is 42.5 inches, the shaft flex is SR, shaft weight is 45g, torque is 5.9, balance is D0, and the total club weight is 305g.

This is a new model of PRGR’s fairway wood.
Although it’s new, it closely resembles previous models, so I almost didn’t notice it was a new release.
Many manufacturers change designs significantly to make new models stand out, but PRGR’s decision to keep the design almost identical likely indicates that the shape and design are so well-executed that there’s no need for drastic changes.
PRGR clubs, from drivers to putters, are known for their high quality. They have a strong reputation for producing excellent wood clubs such as drivers and utilities.

This fairway wood stands out with its **thinness**.
Though there are various innovative aspects, the design remains relatively simple, which I appreciate.
The sole shape is particularly important for fairway woods, which are often struck directly. It’s easy to see that this model shares similarities with the RS Fairway Wood and LS Fairway Wood, which I have tested before. It could be seen as a minor upgrade, but it seems to be a highly refined one.

The sole caught my attention here.
I wonder if something is embedded inside?

The large grooves in the sole have now become a signature feature.
Although large grooves like this are rare, PRGR’s choice to maintain them shows that they have a compelling reason to do so.
It’s clear that PRGR excels at making fairway woods, and their designs are thoughtful and impactful, maintaining their high standards.

The grooves are both wide and deep.
While I initially wondered about the structural integrity of such deep grooves, previous models have not encountered any issues, so I assume this design is safe.

The neck is standard and very simple.
There is no adjustment system installed.
It seems that the focus was more on the club (head) balance rather than including an adjustment system.

The face design is very clean and conveys a sense of good rebound.
There’s an engraving of “CNC MILLED” on the toe side.

The shallow shape is familiar and appears unchanged from past models.
I prefer heads with more thickness for a sense of security, but most manufacturers today use shallow heads.

The face also looks great.
There are no noticeable quirks, and I have no particular complaints.

The grip feels great.
There isn’t anything particularly innovative about it, but it’s a solid, dependable grip.

When I took a few practice swings, the feel was light, and with the SR flex, the shaft flexed a lot.
It felt quite responsive, so I focused on timing and tried to keep my swings a bit more compact.

Setting up with the ball felt quite natural.
It wasn’t breathtaking, but I could align easily, and it gave an impression of a club that would help the ball launch easily with a friendly, rounded face.
Test Swing Results:
The **feel** at impact was soft, which I liked.
It was similar to past models.

The **sound** was a slightly high-pitched metallic sound.
I’ve heard this sound many times before, and it felt solid at impact without any wobble.

The ball easily got airborne.
Despite testing the 3-wood, I was able to launch the ball even with direct strikes.
It felt better to swing with a bit less speed, as going too fast seemed to cause some inconsistency. I focused on maintaining accuracy with a moderate swing, which felt just right.

The head, apart from the shaft, is quite forgiving and does not feel harsh.
This easy-going feel is something I’ve experienced in previous models as well.

The **distance performance** is high, but it’s more of a smooth, steady flight than a sharply aggressive one.
I didn’t feel a significant improvement over previous models after hitting several balls.

As for **control**, it’s not as high, and the ball has more of a **straight trajectory**.
Although it doesn’t curve drastically, I found it easy to produce a hook if I wasn’t careful.
It seems to suit players who prefer a fade due to its excellent forgiveness.
Post-Test Thoughts:
I didn’t get the chance for a full swing, but I would have liked to try it.
I focused on accuracy during my test swings and didn’t feel as satisfied with the results.
I’m curious to try it with a different shaft, something with a bit more of a robust feel.

The club has a very friendly personality, which makes it easy to recommend not only to male golfers but also to female golfers who might find the current specs very suitable.

It’s an easy-to-launch fairway wood with great feel and sound.
There’s no harshness that you’d typically find in a 3-wood.

Although I was trying to identify where it had improved, I couldn’t pinpoint any changes by the end of the test.
If I get a chance, I’d like to do a comparison test to better understand any subtle differences.

I’ll continue to keep an eye on PRGR’s developments.
Ratings:
Ease of Setup: ☆☆☆☆
Feel: ☆☆☆☆
Sound: ☆☆☆☆
Launchability: ☆☆☆☆☆
Stability: ☆☆☆☆
Distance: ☆☆☆☆
Control: ☆☆☆
Based on a 100-point scale:
☆1 = 0–20 points
☆2 = 21–40 points
☆3 = 41–60 points
☆4 = 61–90 points
☆5 = 91–100 points
*Addition: Introduction to this club (I researched this club after writing this article)
PRGR LS Fairway Woods: A complete guide to performance, reviews, and suitable golfers
From the manufacturer’s official page



